GEO Guide 2025

The New Battleground: AI Search Engines Beyond Google

Published: Sept 2, 2025 · Last updated: Sept 12, 2025

TLDR: AI answers sit above the blue links across multiple engines. To win citations and answer share, ship pages that are easy for models to parse, verify, and attribute. Use a short TLDR, atomic claims with inline sources, small facts tables, and structured data that clarifies dates and authorship.
What's changed (Sept 12, 2025)
  • Facts verified: helpful content, FAQPage, AI Overviews, and RAG literature.
  • HTML improved for accessibility, semantic clarity, and machine parsing.
  • JSON-LD upgraded: complete TechArticle plus citation links.
  • Inline citations added near claims for verifiability.

Historical context: from blue links to answer engines

Early SEO (late 1990s–2000s). The web’s first era revolved around directories, keyword density, and link-based authority. Modern SEO: publish helpful content, make sites crawlable, build sensible internal links, and earn trust. Over time, guidance shifted from what crawlers need to what people find helpful.

The rise of AEO (2010s–early 2020s). Featured snippets, knowledge panels, and voice assistants changed expectations: the best result often looked like a direct answer. AEO emerged with concise answers and schema mapping questions to answers (FAQPage), enabling enhanced displays when used appropriately.

GEO in the LLM era (2023–present). Engines surface AI Overviews that synthesize sources and show citations. Research on retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) shows conditioning generation on retrieved evidence improves factuality and attribution. GEO is how publishers adapt: structure claims, add inline citations, keep pages fresh, and make verification easy for models and people.

Deep comparison: SEO vs AEO vs GEO (12 signals)

SignalSEOAEOGEO
Content intentPeople-first depth; topical authorityDirect answers to specific questionsAtomic claims safe to reuse in AI answers
Structured dataArticle/TechArticle, breadcrumbsFAQPage, speakable where applicableComplete Article + explicit dates, optional citation links
Q→A mappingHelpful headings & copyExplicit questions with concise answersAnswers with adjacent provenance and timestamps
Inline citationsOften centralized at bottomSome inline, often list-basedRequired near each claim that needs evidence
Facts tablesNice-to-haveHelps scanMachine-parsable with captions naming metric & date
Freshness signalsUpdated content performs betterMatters for time-sensitive answersCritical: visible “last updated”, truthful JSON-LD dates
IndexabilityRobots/sitemap hygieneSameSame + ensure answerable routes are discoverable
Performance/UXCore Web VitalsScannable blocksSemantic HTML for extraction; accessible figures
Link strategyInternal linking to pillarsLink to source docs for answersPrimary sources only (official docs, standards, research)
TelemetryRankings, CTR, conversionsSnippet visibilityInclusion rate in AI answers, claim pickup, time-to-refresh
WorkflowCMS + dev + SEOEditorial + schema hygieneEditorial + schema + automated freshness & audits
LLM alignmentIndirectEmergentDirect: written for safe LLM reuse (RAG-friendly)
GEO inherits SEO/AEO and adds provenance, dates, machine-parsable structure, and answer telemetry.

Case studies: how GEO changes strategy

Healthcare (policy explainer). Publish an explainer like “Does the 2025 policy expand preventive care coverage?” GEO: place two atomic claims with inline citations to the official policy, include a small table labeled “Preventive services covered – effective 2025-07” with a caption, and show a visible “last updated” date. When a clause changes, update the claim, the table, and the date. Result: higher probability of being cited inside an AI Overview.

Finance (rates & thresholds). Track “2025 transfer limits.” GEO: a table labeled “Daily/Monthly Limits (USD) – updated quarterly”, short claims (“Daily cap is X USD”) with links to the issuer’s docs, and JSON-LD dates that reflect each update. When limits change, the page refreshes quickly; the AI answer cites you as the source of the up-to-date number.

Education (program requirements). Explain “Do online credits count toward residency?” GEO hardens it: the answer sentence cites the registrar, a table lists requirements with an “effective term” column, and the page shows “Last updated” at the top.

Measurement & analytics for GEO

  • Inclusion rate in AI answers: percent of tracked prompts where your brand is a cited source.
  • Claim-level pickup: which sentences get quoted; optimize for clarity and provenance.
  • Time-to-refresh (TTR): hours or days from source change to published update.
  • Citeable coverage: percent of priority pages with TLDR, atomic claims, tables with captions, inline citations, and JSON-LD completeness.
  • Answer engagement: clicks from the answer module to your page; pair with on-page conversions.

External signals show a behavior shift toward answer modules, increasing the importance of inclusion and attribution inside AI summaries.

Governance & ethics: misinformation, accessibility, bias, sustainability

Misinformation & corrections. Treat verifiability as a product feature. Cite primary sources next to claims and keep an edit trail. When a fact changes, update the claim, the table, and the date—not just the date.

Accessibility. Use semantic HTML (tables with caption, figures with figcaption), descriptive alt text, and sufficient contrast.

Bias checks. Sensitive topics need balanced sources and a clear source policy (official standards, peer-reviewed research, recognized institutions).

Sustainability. Prefer HTML text over heavy images for key content; update only when facts change.

Where Wrodium fits in (the GEO engine)

Wrodium assumes your pages are read by people and by models. It scans content for claims, aligns each claim with a source of truth, and suggests edits that tighten language, add inline citations, and refresh dates. It validates JSON-LD completeness and sitemap/indexability. Drawing from RAG principles and aligned with Google guidance, it then tracks whether your brand appears as a cited source in AI answers and which sentences were surfaced.

FAQ

Do I need a special AI sitemap? No. Use a standard sitemap; focus on indexable routes, pre-rendered HTML, and correct structured data.

Should I cite AI Overviews directly? No. Cite the underlying sources (official docs, standards, research).

How do I measure progress? Track inclusion as a cited source, claim-level pickup, TTR, and pair with classic conversions.

References (with context)

  1. Google Developers — Creating helpful content
  2. Google Search Central — FAQPage
  3. Google Support — AI Overviews
  4. Lewis et al. — Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  5. Semrush — AI Overviews study
  6. Pew Research — Click behavior
  7. Digiday — Zero-click challenges
  8. Wrodium Blog — GEO vs SEO vs AEO